Agencies Release Proposed Revisions to Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance

(June 26, 2020) WASHINGTON—Five federal regulatory agencies today requested public comment on new and revised Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance. The Interagency Questions and Answers, which provide information addressing technical flood insurance-related compliance issues, were last updated in 2011.

The agencies are proposing new questions and answers for inclusion in the Interagency Questions and Answers in light of changes to flood insurance requirements under the agencies’ joint rule regarding loans in special flood hazard areas. This rule was promulgated in 2015 to implement provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 and the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014.

The proposal incorporates new questions and answers in several areas, including:

  • The escrow of flood insurance premiums;
  • The detached structure exemption to the mandatory purchase of flood insurance requirement; and
  • Force-placement procedures.

The proposal also revises existing questions and answers to improve clarity and reorganizes questions and answers by topic to make it easier for users to find and review information related to technical flood insurance topics. The proposal is intended to help reduce the compliance burden for lenders related to the federal flood insurance laws.

Separately, the agencies plan to propose new questions and answers at a later date on the private flood insurance requirements implemented by their February 2019 final rule.

The agencies invite comment on this proposal. Comments will be accepted for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

The Federal Register notice is attached.

Agency Contact Phone
Federal Reserve Board Susan Stawick 202.452.2955
FCA Emily Yaghmour 703.883.4056
FDIC Brian Sullivan 202.898.6534
NCUA Ben Hardaway 703.518.6333
OCC Bryan Hubbard 202.649.6870

Agencies Release Proposed Revisions to Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance

(June 26, 2020) WASHINGTON—Five federal regulatory agencies today requested public comment on new and revised Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance. The Interagency Questions and Answers, which provide information addressing technical flood insurance-related compliance issues, were last updated in 2011.

The agencies are proposing new questions and answers for inclusion in the Interagency Questions and Answers in light of changes to flood insurance requirements under the agencies’ joint rule regarding loans in special flood hazard areas. This rule was promulgated in 2015 to implement provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 and the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014.

The proposal incorporates new questions and answers in several areas, including:

  • The escrow of flood insurance premiums;
  • The detached structure exemption to the mandatory purchase of flood insurance requirement; and
  • Force-placement procedures.

The proposal also revises existing questions and answers to improve clarity and reorganizes questions and answers by topic to make it easier for users to find and review information related to technical flood insurance topics. The proposal is intended to help reduce the compliance burden for lenders related to the federal flood insurance laws.

Separately, the agencies plan to propose new questions and answers at a later date on the private flood insurance requirements implemented by their February 2019 final rule.

The agencies invite comment on this proposal. Comments will be accepted for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

The Federal Register notice is attached.

Agency Contact Phone
Federal Reserve Board Susan Stawick 202.452.2955
FCA Emily Yaghmour 703.883.4056
FDIC Brian Sullivan 202.898.6534
NCUA Ben Hardaway 703.518.6333
OCC Bryan Hubbard 202.649.6870

FFIEC Announces Availability of 2019 Data on Mortgage Lending

(June 24, 2020) – The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) today announced the availability of data on 2019 mortgage lending transactions at 5,508 U.S. financial institutions covered by the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). Covered institutions include banks, savings associations, credit unions, and mortgage companies.

The HMDA data are the most comprehensive publicly available information on mortgage market activity. They are used by industry, consumer groups, regulators, and others to assess potential fair lending risks and for other purposes.

The FFIEC releases today several data products to serve a variety of data users. The HMDA Dynamic National Loan-Level Dataset is updated, on a weekly basis, to reflect late submissions and resubmissions. Aggregate and Disclosure Reports provide summary information on individual financial institutions and geographies. The HMDA Data Browser allows users to create custom tables and download datasets that can be further analyzed. In addition, beginning in late March 2020, the FFIEC made available Loan/Application Registers for each HMDA filer of 2019 data, modified to protect borrower privacy.

Understanding the Data

The data include a total of 48 data points providing information about the applicants, the property securing the loan or proposed to secure the loan in the case of non-originated applications, the transaction, and identifiers. A complete list of HMDA data points and the associated data fields is found in Appendix A of the FFIEC’s Filing Instructions Guide for HMDA Data Collected in 2019. Certain smaller-volume financial institutions are not required to report all of these data, pursuant to the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA).1

The 2019 HMDA data use the census tract delineations, population, and housing characteristic data from the 2011–2015 American Community Survey (ACS). In addition, the data reflect metropolitan statistical area (MSA) definitions released by the Office of Management and Budget in 2018 that became effective for HMDA purposes in 2019.

HMDA data comparisons across multiple years are limited by changes in HMDA definitions, values, and thresholds. Also, comparisons for certain geographic areas are limited due to the changes in MSA and census tract boundaries and updates to the population and housing characteristics of census tracts, especially those that follow the decennial census and five-year updates based on the ACS data.

Among other uses, the data help the public assess how financial institutions are serving the housing needs of their local communities and facilitate federal financial regulators’ fair lending, consumer compliance, and Community Reinvestment Act examinations. For example, when these regulators evaluate an institution’s fair lending risk, they analyze HMDA data in conjunction with other information and risk factors, in accordance with the Interagency Fair Lending Examination Procedures.

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Therefore, when regulators conduct fair lending examinations, they analyze additional information before reaching a determination about an institution’s compliance with fair lending laws.

Observations from the 2019 Data2

For 2019, the number of reporting institutions declined by about 3 percent from the previous year to 5,508. The 2019 data include information on 15.1 million home loan applications. Among them, 12.5 million were closed-end, 2.1 million were open-end, and, for another 442,000 records, pursuant to the EGRRCPA’s partial exemptions, financial institutions did not indicate whether the records were closed-end or open-end. The number of closed-end loan applications increased by 21 percent, and the number of open-end line of credit applications decreased by 9 percent. A total of 9.3 million applications resulted in loan originations. Among them, 7.9 million were closed-end mortgage originations, 1.1 million were open-end line of credit originations, and, pursuant to the EGRRCPA’s partial exemptions, 335,000 were originations for which financial institutions did not indicate whether they were closed-end or open-end. The 2019 data include 2.3 million purchased loans, for a total of 17.5 million records. The data also include information on approximately 151,000 preapproval requests that were denied or approved but not accepted.

The total number of originated closed-end loans increased by about 2 million between 2018 and 2019, or 26 percent. Refinance originations for 1-4 family properties increased by 78 percent from 1.9 million, and home purchase lending increased by 4 percent from 4.3 million.3

A total of 2,494 reporters made use of the EGRRCPA’s partial exemptions for at least one of the 26 data points eligible for the exemptions. In all, they account for about 641,000 records and 330,000 originations.

From 2018 to 2019, the share of home purchase loans for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties made to low- or moderate-income borrowers (those with income of less than 80 percent of area median income) increased slightly from 28.1 percent to 28.6 percent, and the share of refinance loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties decreased from 30 percent to 23.8 percent.4

In terms of borrower race and ethnicity, the share of home purchase loans for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties made to Black borrowers rose from 6.7 percent in 2018 to 7.0 percent in 2019, the share made to Hispanic-White borrowers increased slightly from 8.9 percent to 9.2 percent, and those made to Asian borrowers decreased from 5.9 percent to 5.7 percent. From 2018 to 2019, the share of refinance loans for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties made to Black borrowers decreased from 6.2 percent to 5.3 percent, the share made to Hispanic-White borrowers decreased from 6.8 percent to 6.2 percent, and the share made to Asian borrowers increased from 3.7 percent to 5.4 percent.

In 2019, Black and Hispanic-White applicants experienced higher denial rates for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied conventional home purchase loans than non-Hispanic-White applicants. The denial rate for Asian applicants is more comparable to the denial rate for non-Hispanic-White applicants. These relationships are similar to those found in earlier years and, due to the limitations of the HMDA data mentioned above, cannot take into account all legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing.

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured share of first-lien home purchase loans for 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties increased from 19.3 percent in 2018 to 20.2 percent in 2019. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-guaranteed share of such loans increased slightly to 10.6 percent in 2019. The overall government-backed share of such home purchase loans, including FHA, VA, Rural Housing Service, and Farm Service Agency loans, was 33.4 percent in 2019, up from 33 percent in 2018.

The FHA-insured share of refinance mortgages for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties decreased slightly to 12.0 percent in 2019 from 12.8 percent in 2018, while the VA-guaranteed share of such refinance loans increased from 10.2 percent in 2018 to 13.5 percent in 2019.

The share of mortgages originated by nondepository, independent mortgage companies has increased in recent years. In 2019, this group of lenders accounted for 56.4 percent of first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied home-purchase loans, slightly down from 57.2 percent in 2018. Independent mortgage companies also originated 58.1 percent of first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied refinance loans, an increase from 56.1 percent in 2018.

The HMDA data also identify loans that are covered by the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA). Under HOEPA, certain types of mortgage loans that have interest rates or total points and fees above specified levels are subject to certain requirements, such as additional disclosures to consumers, and also are subject to various restrictions on loan terms. For 2019, 6,507 loan originations covered by HOEPA were reported: 3,253 home purchase loans for 1-4 family properties; 442 home improvement loans for 1-4 family properties; and 2,812 refinance loans for 1-4 family properties.

Additional HMDA Information

More information about HMDA data reporting requirements is also available at https://ffiec.cfpb.gov/.

Questions about HMDA supervision should be directed to the institution’s supervisory agency at the following phone numbers:

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation: 877.275.3342; hearing impaired — 800.925.4618
  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, HMDA Assistance Line: 202.452.2016
  • National Credit Union Administration, Office of Consumer Financial Protection: 703.518.1140
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Compliance Risk Policy Division: 202.649.5470
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: 202.435.7000
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Housing: 202.708.0685
Agency Contact Phone
CFPB Marisol Garibay 202.384.8538
FDIC LaJuan Williams-Young 202.898.3876
Federal Reserve Susan Stawick 202.452.2955
NCUA Ben Hardaway 703.518.6333
OCC Stephanie Collins 202.649.6870

FFIEC Announces Availability of 2019 Data on Mortgage Lending

(June 24, 2020) – The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) today announced the availability of data on 2019 mortgage lending transactions at 5,508 U.S. financial institutions covered by the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). Covered institutions include banks, savings associations, credit unions, and mortgage companies.

The HMDA data are the most comprehensive publicly available information on mortgage market activity. They are used by industry, consumer groups, regulators, and others to assess potential fair lending risks and for other purposes.

The FFIEC releases today several data products to serve a variety of data users. The HMDA Dynamic National Loan-Level Dataset is updated, on a weekly basis, to reflect late submissions and resubmissions. Aggregate and Disclosure Reports provide summary information on individual financial institutions and geographies. The HMDA Data Browser allows users to create custom tables and download datasets that can be further analyzed. In addition, beginning in late March 2020, the FFIEC made available Loan/Application Registers for each HMDA filer of 2019 data, modified to protect borrower privacy.

Understanding the Data

The data include a total of 48 data points providing information about the applicants, the property securing the loan or proposed to secure the loan in the case of non-originated applications, the transaction, and identifiers. A complete list of HMDA data points and the associated data fields is found in Appendix A of the FFIEC’s Filing Instructions Guide for HMDA Data Collected in 2019. Certain smaller-volume financial institutions are not required to report all of these data, pursuant to the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA).1

The 2019 HMDA data use the census tract delineations, population, and housing characteristic data from the 2011–2015 American Community Survey (ACS). In addition, the data reflect metropolitan statistical area (MSA) definitions released by the Office of Management and Budget in 2018 that became effective for HMDA purposes in 2019.

HMDA data comparisons across multiple years are limited by changes in HMDA definitions, values, and thresholds. Also, comparisons for certain geographic areas are limited due to the changes in MSA and census tract boundaries and updates to the population and housing characteristics of census tracts, especially those that follow the decennial census and five-year updates based on the ACS data.

Among other uses, the data help the public assess how financial institutions are serving the housing needs of their local communities and facilitate federal financial regulators’ fair lending, consumer compliance, and Community Reinvestment Act examinations. For example, when these regulators evaluate an institution’s fair lending risk, they analyze HMDA data in conjunction with other information and risk factors, in accordance with the Interagency Fair Lending Examination Procedures.

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Therefore, when regulators conduct fair lending examinations, they analyze additional information before reaching a determination about an institution’s compliance with fair lending laws.

Observations from the 2019 Data2

For 2019, the number of reporting institutions declined by about 3 percent from the previous year to 5,508. The 2019 data include information on 15.1 million home loan applications. Among them, 12.5 million were closed-end, 2.1 million were open-end, and, for another 442,000 records, pursuant to the EGRRCPA’s partial exemptions, financial institutions did not indicate whether the records were closed-end or open-end. The number of closed-end loan applications increased by 21 percent, and the number of open-end line of credit applications decreased by 9 percent. A total of 9.3 million applications resulted in loan originations. Among them, 7.9 million were closed-end mortgage originations, 1.1 million were open-end line of credit originations, and, pursuant to the EGRRCPA’s partial exemptions, 335,000 were originations for which financial institutions did not indicate whether they were closed-end or open-end. The 2019 data include 2.3 million purchased loans, for a total of 17.5 million records. The data also include information on approximately 151,000 preapproval requests that were denied or approved but not accepted.

The total number of originated closed-end loans increased by about 2 million between 2018 and 2019, or 26 percent. Refinance originations for 1-4 family properties increased by 78 percent from 1.9 million, and home purchase lending increased by 4 percent from 4.3 million.3

A total of 2,494 reporters made use of the EGRRCPA’s partial exemptions for at least one of the 26 data points eligible for the exemptions. In all, they account for about 641,000 records and 330,000 originations.

From 2018 to 2019, the share of home purchase loans for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties made to low- or moderate-income borrowers (those with income of less than 80 percent of area median income) increased slightly from 28.1 percent to 28.6 percent, and the share of refinance loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties decreased from 30 percent to 23.8 percent.4

In terms of borrower race and ethnicity, the share of home purchase loans for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties made to Black borrowers rose from 6.7 percent in 2018 to 7.0 percent in 2019, the share made to Hispanic-White borrowers increased slightly from 8.9 percent to 9.2 percent, and those made to Asian borrowers decreased from 5.9 percent to 5.7 percent. From 2018 to 2019, the share of refinance loans for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties made to Black borrowers decreased from 6.2 percent to 5.3 percent, the share made to Hispanic-White borrowers decreased from 6.8 percent to 6.2 percent, and the share made to Asian borrowers increased from 3.7 percent to 5.4 percent.

In 2019, Black and Hispanic-White applicants experienced higher denial rates for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied conventional home purchase loans than non-Hispanic-White applicants. The denial rate for Asian applicants is more comparable to the denial rate for non-Hispanic-White applicants. These relationships are similar to those found in earlier years and, due to the limitations of the HMDA data mentioned above, cannot take into account all legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing.

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured share of first-lien home purchase loans for 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties increased from 19.3 percent in 2018 to 20.2 percent in 2019. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-guaranteed share of such loans increased slightly to 10.6 percent in 2019. The overall government-backed share of such home purchase loans, including FHA, VA, Rural Housing Service, and Farm Service Agency loans, was 33.4 percent in 2019, up from 33 percent in 2018.

The FHA-insured share of refinance mortgages for first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied properties decreased slightly to 12.0 percent in 2019 from 12.8 percent in 2018, while the VA-guaranteed share of such refinance loans increased from 10.2 percent in 2018 to 13.5 percent in 2019.

The share of mortgages originated by nondepository, independent mortgage companies has increased in recent years. In 2019, this group of lenders accounted for 56.4 percent of first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied home-purchase loans, slightly down from 57.2 percent in 2018. Independent mortgage companies also originated 58.1 percent of first lien, 1-4 family, site-built, owner-occupied refinance loans, an increase from 56.1 percent in 2018.

The HMDA data also identify loans that are covered by the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA). Under HOEPA, certain types of mortgage loans that have interest rates or total points and fees above specified levels are subject to certain requirements, such as additional disclosures to consumers, and also are subject to various restrictions on loan terms. For 2019, 6,507 loan originations covered by HOEPA were reported: 3,253 home purchase loans for 1-4 family properties; 442 home improvement loans for 1-4 family properties; and 2,812 refinance loans for 1-4 family properties.

Additional HMDA Information

More information about HMDA data reporting requirements is also available at https://ffiec.cfpb.gov/.

Questions about HMDA supervision should be directed to the institution’s supervisory agency at the following phone numbers:

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation: 877.275.3342; hearing impaired — 800.925.4618
  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, HMDA Assistance Line: 202.452.2016
  • National Credit Union Administration, Office of Consumer Financial Protection: 703.518.1140
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Compliance Risk Policy Division: 202.649.5470
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: 202.435.7000
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Housing: 202.708.0685
Agency Contact Phone
CFPB Marisol Garibay 202.384.8538
FDIC LaJuan Williams-Young 202.898.3876
Federal Reserve Susan Stawick 202.452.2955
NCUA Ben Hardaway 703.518.6333
OCC Stephanie Collins 202.649.6870

NCUA Extends MDI Mentoring Grants Application Deadline to July 31

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (June 23, 2020) – Credit unions eligible to apply for the National Credit Union Administration’s minority depository institutions mentoring grants now have until Friday, July 31, to submit their applications, the agency announced today.

The NCUA will make grants of up to $25,000 to help small institutions establish mentoring programs with larger, low-income-designated credit unions to provide expertise and guidance in serving low-income and underserved populations. 

Interested credit unions can apply through the agency’s CyberGrants online portal. Application guidelines are available online here. Staff from the NCUA’s Office of Credit Union Resources and Expansion will be available to answer questions about the program through Wednesday, July 29. Credit unions should submit questions to staff by email to [email protected].

Federal and State Regulatory Agencies Issue Examiner Guidance for Assessing Safety and Soundness Considering the Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Financial Institutions

(June 23, 2020) – The four federal agencies in conjunction with the state bank and credit union regulators today issued examiner guidance to promote consistency and flexibility in the supervision and examination of financial institutions affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. No action on the part of supervised institutions is required.

Stresses caused by the spread of COVID-19 have led to significant economic strain and adversely affected global financial markets. The interagency guidance instructs examiners to consider the unique, evolving, and potentially long-term nature of the issues confronting institutions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and to exercise appropriate flexibility in their supervisory response.

Attachment: Examiner Guidance Considering the Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Institutions

Agency Contact Phone
Federal Reserve Board Darren Gersh 202.452.2955
FDIC Julianne Fisher Breitbeil 202.898.6895
NCUA Laura Todor 703.518.1149
OCC Stephanie Collins 202.649.6870
CSBS Jim Kurtzke 202.728.5733

Federal and State Regulatory Agencies Issue Examiner Guidance for Assessing Safety and Soundness Considering the Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Financial Institutions

(June 23, 2020) – The four federal agencies in conjunction with the state bank and credit union regulators today issued examiner guidance to promote consistency and flexibility in the supervision and examination of financial institutions affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. No action on the part of supervised institutions is required.

Stresses caused by the spread of COVID-19 have led to significant economic strain and adversely affected global financial markets. The interagency guidance instructs examiners to consider the unique, evolving, and potentially long-term nature of the issues confronting institutions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and to exercise appropriate flexibility in their supervisory response.

Attachment: Examiner Guidance Considering the Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Institutions

Agency Contact Phone
Federal Reserve Board Darren Gersh 202.452.2955
FDIC Julianne Fisher Breitbeil 202.898.6895
NCUA Laura Todor 703.518.1149
OCC Stephanie Collins 202.649.6870
CSBS Jim Kurtzke 202.728.5733

NCUA’s Hood: Juneteenth Compels Us to Advance the Goal of Financial Inclusion

NCUA Issues Annual Report on Efforts to Preserve Minority Credit Unions

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (June 19, 2020) – The celebration of Juneteenth compels all of us to do our part to advance the goal of greater financial inclusion for more Americans, National Credit Union Administration Chairman Rodney E. Hood said today. 

“As the nation celebrates this year’s Juneteenth, we must recommit ourselves to the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion, which are necessary to foster and promote greater opportunity for all Americans,” NCUA Chairman Hood said. “As we reflect on the enormous significance of this day and what it represents, it should also remind us how much further we must go.

“The recent protests across America and the COVID-19 pandemic, which has disproportionately affected minority communities, have illustrated the economic and financial challenges of minority, rural, and underserved communities. These events underscore the importance of MDI credit unions to their communities, and the NCUA has and will continue to find more avenues of support for these institutions.”

First celebrated 155 years ago today, Juneteenth remains the most widely recognized observance of the end of slavery in the United States. It commemorates June 19, 1865, when Union forces in Galveston, Texas, read federal orders stating that all previously enslaved people in Texas were now free. Although the Emancipation Proclamation was signed more than two years prior, the minimum level of federal troops in Texas during the Civil War prevented the Proclamation from being enforced. 

Forty-seven states and the District of Columbia recognize Juneteenth either as a state holiday, a ceremonial holiday, or as a day of observance.

Since becoming NCUA Chairman more than 14 months ago, Hood has made fostering greater financial inclusion a priority for the NCUA. During that time, he has advanced a regulatory agenda that has reduces the regulatory burden on credit unions while fostering greater innovation and flexibility so credit unions can meet the evolving needs of their members. 

“Financial inclusion means expanding access to safe and affordable financial services for unbanked and underserved people and communities as well as broadening employment and business opportunities,” Hood said. “We all must work together because all of us have a stake in the outcome. We all benefit when more of our citizens can control their financial futures and enjoy the benefits and opportunities this nation provides.”

Congressional Report Details Efforts to Preserve Minority Credit Unions

In the spirit of fostering greater financial inclusion for all Americans, the NCUA also issued today its annual report to Congress detailing the financial condition of minority credit unions in 2019 and the agency’s efforts to preserve and promote the formation of minority depository institutions.

The 2019 Annual Report to Congress on Preserving Minority Depository Institutions is available on the agency’s website. This report to Congress is submitted in accordance with Section 308 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) and Section 367 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.

A federally insured credit union can qualify as an MDI if 50 percent or more of its current members, eligible potential members, and board members are minorities. A “minority” is defined as any “Black American, Asian American, Hispanic American, or Native American,” as defined in Section 308 FIRREA Act.

MDI credit unions are often the only federally insured financial institution available in rural and urban communities that have been historically unserved by traditional financial institutions. 

At the end of 2019, the NCUA regulated 514 federally insured credit unions with the MDI designation in 36 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. MDI credit unions served more than 3.9 million members and had assets of $40.5 billion. Approximately 10 percent of all federally insured credit unions are MDIs. These institutions are generally small — 57 percent of them have less than $10 million in assets. 

Through the NCUA’s MDI Preservation Program, MDI credit unions have access to grants and loans, training and technical assistance, and guidance from their examiners. In 2019, the NCUA:

  • Chartered one new MDI credit union, Otoe-Missouria in Red Rock, Oklahoma; 
  • Provided 58 low-income-designated MDI credit unions with $738,000 in technical assistance grants; and
  • Provided three MDI credit unions with nearly $75,000 in grants under the agency’s mentoring program pilot. 

Building on the success of its MDI initiatives last year, the NCUA in 2020 has: 

  • Co-sponsored the Freedman’s Bank Forum with the U.S. Department of Treasury and other federal financial institution regulators on March 3; 
  • Hosted a two-day MDI Forum on March 3–4; and
  • Made $125,000 available to support MDI credit unions through our MDI mentoring program. 

NCUA’s Harper: Take Action to Advance Economic Equality and Justice

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (June 18, 2020) – During the Illinois Credit Union League’s Virtual Town Hall Meeting on June 11, National Credit Union Administration Board Member Todd M. Harper called on the NCUA and the credit union industry to take action to advance economic equality and justice.

“Civil rights and human rights are core American values, and I fully embrace them,” Board Member Harper said. “I also believe deeply in equality. That’s why the brutal killing of George Floyd shocked and sickened me. For the African American community, the circumstances of Mr. Floyd’s death are unfortunately far too familiar. As a leader at the NCUA, I cannot respond by just saying, ‘we need to do better’ or ‘we must do more.’ Those lines rightfully ring hollow to communities of color. They are empty promises. To achieve real, sustainable change, I, like each of us, must take action within my sphere of influence.”

During his remarks, which are available on the NCUA’s website, Harper outlined four initial approaches he will advance as a Board Member. They include:

  • Building diverse and inclusive workforces and supplier chains,
  • Enhancing support for minority depository institutions,
  • Enforcing fair lending laws, and
  • Funding initiatives aimed at closing the wealth gap.

Additionally, Harper detailed his experience learning about credit unions’ efforts around the country to meet their members’ needs and develop innovative initiatives aimed at creating economic equity and opportunity. He stressed that credit unions that engage with their communities would be remembered and supported for their efforts. Harper also called on the credit union system to push for greater financial inclusion.

“To address long-standing societal problems of economic equality and justice, we need you to recommit to addressing these issues in your communities by finding ways to adapt your products and services,” Harper said. “In serving everyone, your credit union, your members, and our country will be better for it. You will also be fulfilling the “people helping people” philosophy at the heart of the credit union movement.”

Harper also discussed the economic outlook and how it could potentially affect credit union performance, the regulatory and legislative enhancements made to the Central Liquidity Facility, and the NCUA’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. He invited those credit unions that are not already members of the CLF or have access to the facility through an agent to join the facility.

NCUA’s Harper: Take Action to Advance Economic Equality and Justice

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (June 18, 2020) – During the Illinois Credit Union League’s Virtual Town Hall Meeting on June 11, National Credit Union Administration Board Member Todd M. Harper called on the NCUA and the credit union industry to take action to advance economic equality and justice.

“Civil rights and human rights are core American values, and I fully embrace them,” Board Member Harper said. “I also believe deeply in equality. That’s why the brutal killing of George Floyd shocked and sickened me. For the African American community, the circumstances of Mr. Floyd’s death are unfortunately far too familiar. As a leader at the NCUA, I cannot respond by just saying, ‘we need to do better’ or ‘we must do more.’ Those lines rightfully ring hollow to communities of color. They are empty promises. To achieve real, sustainable change, I, like each of us, must take action within my sphere of influence.”

During his remarks, which are available on the NCUA’s website, Harper outlined four initial approaches he will advance as a Board Member. They include:

  • Building diverse and inclusive workforces and supplier chains,
  • Enhancing support for minority depository institutions,
  • Enforcing fair lending laws, and
  • Funding initiatives aimed at closing the wealth gap.

Additionally, Harper detailed his experience learning about credit unions’ efforts around the country to meet their members’ needs and develop innovative initiatives aimed at creating economic equity and opportunity. He stressed that credit unions that engage with their communities would be remembered and supported for their efforts. Harper also called on the credit union system to push for greater financial inclusion.

“To address long-standing societal problems of economic equality and justice, we need you to recommit to addressing these issues in your communities by finding ways to adapt your products and services,” Harper said. “In serving everyone, your credit union, your members, and our country will be better for it. You will also be fulfilling the “people helping people” philosophy at the heart of the credit union movement.”

Harper also discussed the economic outlook and how it could potentially affect credit union performance, the regulatory and legislative enhancements made to the Central Liquidity Facility, and the NCUA’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. He invited those credit unions that are not already members of the CLF or have access to the facility through an agent to join the facility.